The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed. These are the opening words of Stephen King’s epic 8 volume tome, The Dark Tower, considered to be the esteemed author’s crowning achievement in the literary world. The sentence, taken into the context of the entire series could be read in face value as a statement of plot, or carry a deeper meaning to the themes of the story. But, more than anything, it establishes for the reader the sense of a journey taking place before our eyes. Now, who would have thought that the hardest journey that would befall this story would come about in it’s trek through a treacherous land known as Hollywood? After many years of talk and numerous attempts at production, The Dark Tower finally made it’s way to the big screen just last week, fulfilling a desire that many fans of Stephen King and of the books had longed hoped for. And the end result of all that waiting was an overwhelming and almost universal feeling of disappointment. Why did a movie with almost two decades of development result in such a lackluster showing? A variety of factors certainly contributed; primary among them being the fact that the movie wasn’t very good. Fans of the books in particular were really sore about the way that the vast, epic story got truncated into a singular 90 minute film. Other casual fans were left confused because the movie failed to properly establish it’s world and lore, making them wonder why it even was worth getting excited about. But, what I see with The Dark Tower is a prime example of a project that unfortunately get mismanaged due to the unforgiving forces of time in the Hollywood machine. This process is also so common in the industry that it’s been given it’s own ominous name; Development Hell.
When The Dark Tower began in the 1980’s, with the publication of the first volume titled The Gunslinger, Stephen King was already a household name and already in good standing within Hollywood. Two of his books had already become box office hits (1976’s Carrie and 1980’s The Shining), and many more were already in development. King was also beginning to use his fame to carry a lot more clout within the industry, stressing his displeasure with how some of his stories had been changed for the big screen. As The Dark Tower continued to be written with each subsequent volume, King remained very protective of his work. Hollywood remained more interested in King’s more grounded thrillers for the most part, considering that they were cheaper to make than adapting a multi-part fantasy saga. But, that changed when the success of The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter brought fantasy back into the spotlight in a big way. Suddenly The Dark Tower was in demand and given the opportunity to be brought together as a whole. However, this was easier said than done. Initially, it was revealed that director J.J. Abrams was going to be involved, but he quickly dropped out after landing the Star Trek gig. Then Universal, the rights holders, announced that they were bringing the entire series together through a joint theatrical and television presentation under the supervision of Ron Howard; with a trilogy of films and two seasons of a series giving enough time due to the epic tale. Howard even got as far as casting before Universal got cold feet. The project was given over to Warner Bothers, who soon balked at the soaring budget, and they passed, also leading to Ron Howard’s departure. Sony picked up what was left, managed to cast Idris Elba and Matthew McConaughey in the leads to fans approval, and got the film finally completed after many years. Sadly, all that work and determination doesn’t always translate into a good movie.
So, are the studios to blame for The Dark Tower’s failure. Are Stephen King’s books just too un-filmmable? Are audiences just not interested in the story anymore? There is no simple answer to what happened to The Dark Tower and where things went all wrong. The simple thing is that time took it’s toll on the project, with more and more complications adding to inevitable disaster. Being passed around didn’t help the project at all, and it probably would have served the movie better to have been scrapped and restarted somewhere else, where better opportunities could have benefited it. Unfortunately Hollywood is not a place that likes to admit failure. A lot of projects that enter “development hell” never get out, because doing so means that money spent just ended up going to waste. A lot of companies purely use unfinished projects as fodder for trade, protecting the value of the rights for that project while at the same time never doing anything with them. Eventually a studio gives up their claim when more interested parties come along, and they can make a sale or trade that passes along the cost of the project to another, allowing them to recoup. And in all this time, no movement on the project ever gains speed. That’s why it’s called “development hell,” because it’s where projects disappear and live out a tortuous existence out of their control. And if a project does make it out, it doesn’t turn out for the better, like with The Dark Tower. With promising ideas behind it’s back, like the TV and Film crossover, The Dark Tower could have been really something, but instead we are left with a lackluster single outing that feels like the bare minimum of what could have been. It’s a sad result, but The Dark Tower is not alone.
Honestly, the fact that The Dark Tower exists at all is something of miracle, considering how unforgiving the industry can be. Development Hell not only affects big projects like Tower, but a whole variety of other projects as well, ranging from those still in script phase all the way to films in physical production. For every movie that makes it to completion, there are maybe twenty more that don’t. More than anything, it’s an issue affected by dollars and cents. Some movies gain traction, only to face a brick wall once the industry’s budget crunching sees the red flags appearing on the horizon. It becomes less of a problem when the film is still in it’s scripting phase, because then all the company needs to do is cut the writer a check, and then just shelve the script, because it cost them nothing to just sit on it indefinitely, unless there is a licensing issue. Unfortunately, other projects make it past the scripting stage and into physical production, which then contributes to a lot of budget overruns the longer a production is put on hold. Once a project stops production, it becomes a lot more expensive to either keep it in suspension or to start it up again, which is why so many companies stop production early when things aren’t going well, and if it’s too late, they try their best to pass the cost over to someone else. Money problems are not a new thing in Hollywood, as a lot of the industry is built upon the foundation of many failed enterprises. But, some productions go even too far, and take on a life of their own as stories about what could have been. Tim Burton’s failed attempt at a Superman film resulted in a now legendary aborted production, and Terry Gilliam’s many attempts at adapting Don Quixote to the big screen ironically echoes the futile journey of it’s literary subject. Both productions have been spotlighted in documentaries, The Death of Superman Lives (2015) and Lost in La Mancha (2002), which do an exceptional job at showing just how maddening it can be to see a movie start production, only to fall apart and never see the light of day.
Sadly what contributes to the state of these failed productions is something that I already spotlighted in a previous article, and that’s the unfortunate agitator known as hype. Hype can be a movie’s best friend, but it can also unsteady a delicate situation and make the inevitable fall all that much harder. One thing that Hollywood seems to love doing often is generate early hype for a production. It can either appear as an Easter egg in some franchise film, or produced through a word of mouth whisper campaign through press circles, or even made through a very pointed tease. Regardless, Hollywood runs the risk for making announcements so early in production. It’s even more risky when the tease is all they have. Now, they have to live up to the audience expectations that created, and the longer that the film remains in production, the more they leave themselves open to disappointment. Audience attention spans are far more fleeting these days, with tastes changing on a dime without any warning. By the time a long awaited movie does finally come out, it’s window may have already passed, and the early hype would prove to be worthless in the end. Sometimes, if well managed, studios can use early hype as a way of gauging audience interest, and if they see little excitement, then they can quietly let the project die in development. Unfortunately, some hype campaigns are not well managed, especially when you run into the factor that some involved parties are more excited than others. Directors and actors in particular love to tout their passion projects, and hype them up even when there is no chance for them to be made. I remember when Guillermo Del Toro teased his involvement in a new Haunted Mansion movie with the Disney company with an announcement at Comic Con, complete with a teaser poster to go with it. Sadly, many years later, this is all we’ve gotten related to the project, and in all likelihood, that’s all that will every be. Early hype is good only if the possibility is there for it to become a reality, and if you are out there only promising dream projects that’ll never happen, sooner or later, audiences will stop believing in what you say.
Development hell is also factored by the moving target that is audience interest. For a lot of movies, timing is everything. A film can be well made and have a lot of promise, but if it is not in-sync with the times it ends up being released in, then it loses all of it’s appeal. A lot of movies that make it past the script phase end up falling into this hole because of that reason. There is a thing in the film industry known as the “Black List” which is an annual survey of what is regarded as the best un-produced screenplays. These are the aforementioned scripts that the studios sit on, only they garner heat enough to still grab public attention, thus staying afloat in Development Hell. For a lot of these, it’s all a matter of timing, which sadly may never come about. I remember hearing about one script that made it out of the list for a period of time called College Republicans, from screenwriter Wes Jones. It was a true life inspired story about the early days of future Republican Party strategists Karl Rove and Lee Atwater when they were in college. The development of the film gained steam in the wake of Rove’s controversial time in the White House as Chief of Staff, and it looked as if we were about to get a fascinating character study about this contemporary figure. It even got as far as having Harry Potter actor Daniel Radcliffe cast as Atwater, but for some reason this project suddenly went quiet. My belief is that it’s short window closed up quickly, and whoever was involved lost interest. I think the changing political climate factored in, as the Republican Party itself has changed, making Rove and Atwater far less fascinating figures. The script may someday live again, but in a political landscape dominated by Trump, it’s hard to say if this political study may ever find it’s time ever again, because both politics and the Republican Party will be unrecognizable after this.
Getting off politics now, I just find it fascinating how time affects the development of movies in general. Some films rush through production without any hangups, while others languish for what seems like an eternity. But, why does it affect some movies more than others. Sometimes it’s not just worries about the budget that puts movies on hold, but a lot of internal politicking that gets in the way. Sometimes the studios put the brakes on a film because there is a dispute between the people making it and the people financing it. Sometimes a studio sees a change in management and that leaves the already in development projects in a sort of limbo, as they are remnants of the old guard’s way of doing things. This particular factor is what leads to some being released long after they were completed, to little or no fanfare. A lot of companies, for whatever reason, go under and leave a lot of projects hanging. Some of these even remain fascinating relics as half complete films that had the potential to become masterpieces. One interesting example is an animated film called The Thief and the Cobbler (1993). Worked on by legendary independent animator Richard Williams for over 20 years, his financial support ran out and he was forced to sell his uncompleted work to a major studio, who completed it with inferior animation at another company, completely ruining the director’s original vision. Like The Dark Tower, too much time and outside interference spoiled what should’ve been a home-run with Cobbler. Some devoted animation fans have since made an effort to reassemble the original Richard Williams version, which is in various states of completion, in what is called the “Recobbled Cut,” and it’s a fascinating look at what could have been. For Williams, 20 years of work created something beautiful, but ultimately incomplete because of how complex it became. Eventually, the desires of the artist and those paying for the art become a sticking point, and the art became compromised and cheapened in the end as a result. It’s the sad reality of the industry that movies rarely have a pleasant development towards completion, usually ending up a mangled mess by the end.
So, while the end result for The Dark Tower is an unfortunate one, it is not at all surprising. It was too long of a wait for the film, and too much interference slowed the production down. As a result, you can see that lesser effort was put into the final product, and more problematic than that, too much was left out because the budget wouldn’t allow for it. What should have been a Tolkein-esque epic saga that could have stood side by side with the acclaimed films set in Middle Earth is instead an indistinguishable action thriller; no more special than anything else out there. King’s novels were a game-changer; the movie is sadly not. And what upsets me more is that this one actually had some ingredients that could have made it amazing. They certainly made good casting choices with Elba and McConaughey as the Gunslinger and Man in Black respectively. But, The Dark Tower becomes yet another “what could have been” tale in the history of Hollywood. I wish that this had become a reality back when they were planning a television and film adaptation. In fact, if the success of Game of Thrones has proven anything, it’s that The Dark Tower would have been better served being adapted into a series rather than a film. That way, you can devote enough time to capturing King’s full vision. It’s not like that hasn’t worked well before; case in point, the made-for-TV adaptation of It (1990). But, for now, The Dark Tower is another victim of that sadly all too common cinematic wrecking ball known as “development hell.” It’s unfortunate that money, egos, and changing attitudes end up spoiling the completion of very promising film productions, but considering that this is such a high stakes game, it is also very predictable as well. It makes you appreciate when a movie does live up to it’s potential even more, considering how miraculous a thing it is to get a movie out of development in the first place. You always hope that every good story makes it out of hell and into paradise, but in Hollywood, that’s a story that sadly rarely happens.